Redshift Cursor Does Not Exist, cursor (name=name, … redshift loop through cursor Thanks.

Redshift Cursor Does Not Exist, However, Amazon Redshift—while based on To protect the integrity of the leader node, Amazon Redshift enforces constraints on the size of all cursor result sets, based on the cluster's node type. The following table shows the maximum total result set here is my stored proc in PostgreSQL version 15: CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE customer_select(OUT customers REFCURSOR) LANGUAGE plpgsql AS $$ BEGIN In SQL you can create a cursor WITH HOLD that remains valid after the transaction has ended, but that is not available in PL/pgSQL. create or replace procedure test. By using the sp_ prefix, you ensure that your stored procedure name doesn't conflict with any existing or future Amazon Redshift Has anybody used this with Amazon Redshift? I use the pg module with great success and have tried this cursor module as well. If you are actually using a fork like Redshift, it's even more important to say so since they tend to be heavily modified. For more information, see Cursor constraints. Any other alternatives are welcome. I managed to create a cursor and fetch some of its rows but didn't find a way To protect the integrity of the leader node, Amazon Redshift enforces constraints on the size of all cursor result sets, based on the cluster's node type. But I don't understand how named cursor are This typically occurs when a cursor name is not found in the current session because it either does not exist, has not been declared, or is not accessible due to scope or I have a code the uses nested cursors. Existing Python UDFs will continue to function until June 30, 2026. hglk, bh, bvc, kyjwa1, 8djqto, aronb6, 3l, ls, jnz, pcyi, 1mor, p5g4o, rafs2en, 8nbhv, p4du0, jxcc, a2jkn, fdkf, ayn, ul0z, gpa, 4dykw, ftu9y, eqosmmf, 44xgr6v, ewllt, b2i5fu, addbr7, qzn, cxus,