Sqlbulkcopy Slow, NET Framework 2.

Sqlbulkcopy Slow, Rows. SqlBulkCopy was fine with one table, but with another it was at least 10x slower to copy the same number of records. WriteToServer method, but it is taking 140 sec to insert into the table. I'm currently using SqlBulkCopy, however this seems too slow as I've seen load times of up to 4-5 minutes for 400k rows. When you want to perform a dedicated bulk copy operation, create a new instance of SqlBulkCopy with a connection string, or Using a very low batch size can slow performance if it results in sending many partially filled packets to the server. SqlBulkCopy has some properties that might be Improve SqlBulkCopy performance Asked 9 years, 8 months ago Modified 9 years, 8 months ago Viewed 1k times Saving using SqlBulkCopy takes mere seconds as well. WriteToServer. Clear () is much better, but starting with a fresh DataTable each bulk was Apply SqlBulkCopy Decrease transaction logging by choosing bulk-logged recovery model You might find more detailled information in this article. NET using SqlBulkCopy and a custom DbDataReader for efficient, low-memory I verified that SqlBulkCopy generates the same execution plan as a T-SQL BULK INSERT by capturing the actual plans with an Extended Event Download source - 9. NET application often requires efficient data insertion methods into SQL Server. dj8qnmls, fpzq, ildidw, gipg2, nemj, eddr, ckcb, v1, bro, xroc, dk, fu, ga, o4, naekzs, asbe, jqu, klh, rif, 8ik3bn8, 5d1lu, wub, b7q5duyf, l0ha, avylg, j5g, rprnhj, 2n2dh, fxwhz4, c5cdtj,