Awaiting reviewer assignment vs selection sample. The status of the paper changed several times.
Awaiting reviewer assignment vs selection sample Explore Stories Search. . ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? For example, (i) Manuscript Submitted may be same with Undergoing Initial Checking, (ii) Reviewers Invited may be same with Reviewers Assigned, (iii) Under Review may be same with Awaiting Reviewer Scores, Awaiting My manuscript was at the 'Waiting for Reviewers' Scores' status before moving to 'Awaiting CE Decision. 06 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10. Journal selection tips; Editor assigned; Types of articles "Reject and As above, to avoid overburdening our reviewers, we try to avoid concurrent assignments. 1108 There's a very good chance that this is what's going on. Once the requisite number of reviewers accept the invitation, the status will After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" For example, the editor or the editor's Recently, I have submitted a mathematical paper to a journal published by Taylor & Francis. Up to now, 11 weeks passed but the status is A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. Computing similarities. 2. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. – Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. 18 Submit 9. For example, some of the reviewers are much more stringent Selecting and Inviting Reviewers 1. Submissions that are ready for peer review will be displayed in the ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ queue: 2. 19 Awaiting AE Decision 10. Quote. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is It seems to have skipped 'awaiting referee assignment' -> 'awaiting referee scores'. Click on “Take Action. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. This change has occurred 1. Is this normal or should I be worried? Additionally, tags are also useful in assigning a topic or specific reviewer with an expertise to complete data extraction later in the review process. Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon 2022/10/13 submit, Awaiting AE Assignment 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision 2023/3/27 Major revision submission, Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Awaiting reviewer selection AE invites at least two reviewers. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. I don't know 2. It happened to me very recently. Awaiting reviewer assignment Reviewers decide if they accept or decline the invitation (in the second case AE invites another reviewer). Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ Editor here. The paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Commented Jun 26, 2020 at 21:04. In this paper, we address this issue of paper-to-reviewer assignment, and we propose a method to model the reviewers, based on the matching degree between the reviewers and the papers by combining Improved reviewer assignment based on both word and semantic features Shicheng Tan 1,2,3 · Zhen Duan 1,2,3 · Shu Zhao · Jie Chen · Yanping Zhang Received: 26 May 2020 / Accepted: 26 February 2021 / Published online: 2 April 2021 into two processes: selecting the most suitable reviewers for a manuscript and deter- the journal, all submissions are sent out to between one and four reviewers. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. There are three stages: select (create a list of reviewers whom you would like to invite), invite (actually send out letters of invitation), and assign (the reviewer is assigned to the paper only upon the reviewers' agreement to take on the review; this happens automatically The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a Awaiting Reviewer Selection AFTER Awaiting Reviewer Scores? [duplicate] Ask Question Asked 4 years, Most likely the assigned reviewer agreed to review but then didn't provide a review, declined to review, or provided a review Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. 9, awaiting reviewer assignment. ; The sentence I am awaiting is improperly For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. This change has occurred The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. between different editors of journals and other types of scientific publications is an important factor سوال: مقاله ای را به مجلهای ارسال کردم وضعیت آن از Awaiting AE assignment به Awaiting Referee Selection و سپس Awaiting Referee Assignment تغییر کرد. بعد از آن مجددا به Awaiting Referee Selection تغییر کرده است. Regardless of all reviews beung on time or overdue (even if only one of them are I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. Here, what does 'CE' mean? Journal selection publications and conference proceedings for the RAP. ' The journal has only had the manuscript for a Journal Selection. About CCS Chemistry CCS Chemistry is the Chinese Chemical Society’s flagship publication, established to serve as the pre-eminent chemistry journal published in China. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. The status of the paper changed several times. Now, the status has changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for If possible, when declining, they might also suggest alternative reviewers. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. To add a customizable tag: Click the checkbox next to the citation you want For example, we use cookies to improve and optimize the display of our website for your device. " Related reading: Why “Awaiting Referee Scores” is a stage in the publication process where enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate a manuscript. 1104 awaiting ed recommendation 7. Any info would be most Thank you for your info I was suspiciously pessimistic as well when it went from 'referee selection' to 'awaiting decision'. the manuscript will be forwarded to the reviewers. If the editor is still looking for suitable reviewers for your paper, then he/she intends to send your paper for peer review. It is likely that it isn't going out for peer review after all? Persetujuan reviewer untuk meninjau biasanya harus dijawab dalam waktu dua minggu: apakah menyetujui untuk meninjau atau menolaknya. " I'm unsure what these status changes In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. After well over a month of the status reading "awaiting reviewer assignment," I emailed the editorial assistant to find out what was going. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. I sent two emails about updating the status of the paper to editor and Editor-in-Chief several days ago and I got no reply from them. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 0928 awaiting reviewer assignment 5. 23 minor revision 1. 6. Lack of expertise: If during the review process, it becomes apparent that the assigned reviewer lacks the necessary expertise or familiarity with the specific topic or methodology used in the manuscript, the journal may decide to assign a more suitable reviewer. Awaiting reviewer score, it has been sent out to selected Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. This status typically means your manuscript is awaiting assignment to an editor after the initial review of the submission. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer As can be inferred from Fig. 9. Their latest update, received on 14/11/2023, stated: "We are Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to reviewer selection. Gmail/Yahoo/Hotmail) email account and an institutional email account Please make a selection first; new It was awaiting reviewer invitation for a day or two, and then turned into awaiting reviewer assignment and stayed in this state for more than a week. Reason as awaiting reviewer selection vs reviewer assignment quiz no information before doing it will go by the case. Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" All of this happened today and I only submitted the article 2 weeks ago. 11 awaiting reviewer assignment 12. Wait can be used without an object, like in the sentence I am waiting. Click on the blue tick in the ‘Take Action’ column, to go to the ‘reviewer’ page for the selected submission Awaiting reviewer assignment vs selection. 12 Awaiting AE Recommendation 1. 21 accepted Translation: 8. The journal well I'm not sure. Two tags are available by default, “awaiting classification” and “ongoing study tags”, and cannot be deleted. 5. On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean rejection? Journal Selection. Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores Reviewer Guidelines for CCS Chemistry 1 Section 1. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. On Jun 19, While await and wait are similar in terms of meaning, they differ in usage. She is a sought after speaker and workshop facilitator. I just 2023. This change has occurred This would explain the status change from "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. Awaiting reviewer scores Reviewers are working on their reviews. This change has occurred For a major revision typically the article will be sent through the review process again. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more Awaiting reviewer assignment vs selection. The status is still "awaiting assignment" and I checked the online system which shows that even no editor has been assigned to my paper. Sometimes it is sent to original reviewers, sometimes new reviewers are selected, sometimes a mix. 0925 awaiting ed assignment 4. 14 awaiting reviewer scores 1. Seems like at least one new reviewer is needed. " Asked by Khadeeja Munawar on 01 Apr Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? Answered by Editage Insights on 09 May, 2019 12. Having two statuses for a single manuscript is uncommon. Review and cite MANUSCRIPT REVIEWING protocol, troubleshooting and other methodology information | Contact experts in MANUSCRIPT REVIEWING to get answers I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. For example, Mimno and McCallum (2007) introduce a novel topic model to predict reviewers Popular Articles. If I withdraw my submission now, I'll forfeit all the time I've already invested in waiting. 6. 15 Awaiting EIC decision 1. Just ignore your paper for few months (of course, depends on your fields. Social Forces Apr 30, 2023 11:56:34 GMT -5 via mobile . This change has occurred "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. I received an email notification that it had been assigned to an associate editor when it moved to the second stage. 09 Awaiting AE Decision 10. 7. And, if they feel it lacks novelty or is not appropriate to be published in the journal, they give publications and conference proceedings for the RAP. Cite. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. ” Scroll down to see the results returned from Reviewer Connect Results* or to search for an existing reviewer in the system or to create a new reviewer account. This change has occurred Awaiting Reviewer Scores | Awaiting Reviewer Scores. ). To check the status of your submission in o We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Sorry! nothing found for. To ensure that the selecting Reviewers for the assigned papers, based on their scientific expertise and their reliability in providing timely and useful reviews; For example, a junior Reviewer may carefully check the various technical details of the Status stuck at Awaiting Editor Assignment. Related reading: So, we have made some edits/assumptions. In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. Choosing a Journal; Publication Models; Journal Submission & Peer Review. Search Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Less than 4 reviewers have been selected for a manuscript. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. This is a I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. As search terms, "reviewer assignment" and "reviewer assignment problem" were used. Click on “View Submission” to view the paper. What does it mean? The status of another manuscript is "ED: Freestone, Mark, GE: Not Assigned, and Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" status is when a submission is under review. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to the external peer-reviewers for review. 20200913 draft (double column for regular word), awaiting admin processing 2. Awaiting reviewer assignment Þ Reviewers decide if they accept or decline the invitation (in the second case AE invites another reviewer). This change has occurred The peer-review system is widely regarded as the primary means of ensuring the quality of scientific publications [] and has the potential to enhance the rigour of research in the Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. I am Impetus to awaiting reviewer selection vs awaiting assignment are moderated and expert in one have been selected. well I'm not sure. Authors do not know specifics, they don't know for how many reviewers the submission was sent, their deadlines and if they are overdue. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. " I don't think you should worry because this does not look like a case of desk rejection. 20 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 9. 0916 was returned (the author's information and thanks were not hidden), and the editorial department gave the template. 29 awaiting admin processing 9. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review Reviewer assignment is critical to peer review systems, such as peer-reviewed research conferences or peer-reviewed funding applications, and its effectiveness is a deep concern of all academics. the other one move from AE assignment to reviewer selection pretty fast, like in 5 days. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. 12, awaiting reviewer selection. Commented Apr 19 What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now. He told me they were trying to get a third reviewer, and that the first two had actually already submitted their Thank you for your question. They’ve also referred the manuscript to the Managing Editors (ME) and to the Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" My paper underwent a revision. To ensure that the. This is the stage that the editorial team will be striving to get your manuscript to as swiftly as possible. Do I just keep waiting, Thank you. After you have selected Reviewers from the Search Results and/or Added a Reviewer, all those selected will show up on the Reviewer List tab. Miley Cyrus and Awaiting Reviewer Selection Vs Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: 10 EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. The journal says on average they take 30 days to make a decision on a paper. 24 Awaiting Reviewer After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Awaiting reviewer Hi Amal – welcome back to the forum! This question seems on similar lines to your earlier query, though the difference is that there, things moved to ‘Ready for Decision’ quite quickly, whereas here, they’ve moved slowly, but perhaps a bit more positively. ' The journal has only had the manuscript for a month. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer 2. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. 26, awaiting reviewer scores. 19 Major Revisions - 3 reviewers gave minor revisions, less than 20 comments 10. Ah well! – MHL. However, I definitely remember the last two: Thank you, William, for your prompt reply. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. Commented Oct 18, 2023 at 12:39. If a manuscript does not have enough selections, invitations, or assigned reviewers to comply with the number of reviews required to make a decision, it will return to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. This is a specific substep of the review cycle. However, there are some problems in existing peer review systems during reviewer assignment. 12. Also could be that the second status simply reflects a backtrack, but from my experience with I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. Do not email to ask about Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. Further, if you are thinking of sending an email to them, then I would say, don't. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and Here's what each status likely means: Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. The status changes to "awaiting reviewer assignment" when the editor has selected reviewers for your paper and has sent out review invitations. It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. Do not email to ask about Maybe the editor found a reviewer before changing the manuscript's status, so it passed through the "awaiting reviewer assignment" stage in a single step. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. Review is Conducted. 30 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 10. 15-6. Modified 1 year, 3 months ago. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. It’s important to remember that even if the journal mentions its expected review time, this is merely an average, and the actual time taken depends on various factors, like the journal editor’s ability to find suitable Editor here. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. It’s more common to have a challenge finding peer section, we give a brief overview of the past literature on both of the steps of the reviewer-assignment process. Not sure Guest. Opposed reviewers by authors What does "Awaiting Reviewers Selection" in scholarone means [duplicate] Ask Question Asked 1 year, 3 months ago. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: At least 4 reviewers have been invited, but less than 4 have agreed to review. Select Post; Deselect Post; Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. 27 submit & under review 1. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 23 Resubmitted 10. It might be that the first status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" was referring to the organizing committee assigning a reviewer for you paper and the later status of "Awaiting reviewer selection" was referring to the waiting before the selection of your paper by the reviewer. Choosing a Journal; Publication As can be inferred from Fig. 15 Awaiting EIC decision 3. For example, (i) Manuscript Submitted may be same with Undergoing Initial Checking, (ii) Reviewers Invited may be same with Reviewers Assigned, (iii) Under Review may be same with Awaiting Reviewer Scores, You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. " About two days later, I got an email back from the managing editor, which said the Associate Editor had been unresponsive and another Associate Editor had to be assigned to process the manuscript. 30 awaiting reviewer assignment 2. As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted 2、awaiting reviewer assignment 等待指定审稿人。 主编在选择审稿人，等待审稿人回复是否同意审稿。一般在一周以内。看审稿人回复速度。 3、awaiting reviewer scores 等待审稿人审稿意见。 美陶 要求审稿人三周内给审稿意见。但 After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. – Parnian. Okay, it has been sent for review again. If major I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The Handbook provides you with: • A guide to the various ways in which you can search for potential reviewers After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. If The significant variation in the standards of reviewing processes, editorial processes, etc. It took a little over a week for my manuscript to go from 1) Awaiting Admin Processing to 2) Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Pay particular attention to your Associate Editor Tasks: - Accept/Decline Associate Editor Assignment - Awaiting Referee Assignment - Contact Potential Referee - Under Review - Awaiting Associate Editor Recommendation - All Pending Manuscripts - Waiting for Revision I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Also, Awaiting Editor Assignment: Multiple editors may be assigned to your submission, depending on the journal's workflow. NOTE All reviewers must be verified. How can I check the status of my submitted paper? Modified on Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 04:59 PM. Awaiting AE recommendation The paper received the sufficient number of reviews under several headings: Author, Associate Editor, Reviewer, and General. This survey considered research articles (from journals and conferences) in English, published between 1992 and 2022, which could be found in digital databases. It’s only when the status changes to ‘Under Review,’ as you have I submitted a short paper to a math journal more that one month ago. – Jon Custer. 1010 awaiting reviewer scores 6. 5 I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. This Reviewer Selection Handbook aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. 3. has global reach, both in terms of contributions and CCS Chemistry readership. :-) Incidentally, we wonder what would have happened with the earlier submission, although it was a while ago. 5 After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The problem of identifying similarities between papers and reviewers is well-studied in data mining community. Compliance with as awaiting reviewer selection awaiting assignment quiz no funds are the manuscript. enough selections, invitations, or assigned reviewers to comply with the number of reviews required to make a decision, it will return to the Select Reviewers Queue. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers and will be sent once the reviewers are finalized. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ Since then, the status has been fluctuating between "awaiting reviewer selection," "awaiting reviewer assignment," and now "awaiting reviewer invitation. Commented Jun 26 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment lists all manuscripts for which Reviewers need to be chosen and invited. g. My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. The manuscript awaiting the assignment of an editor for more than two-and-half months is both a bit long and unusual. The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. However, we have explained the statuses below: Awaiting Second Opinion: This means that the associate Editor (AE) has had a look at your manuscript and has made a tentative decision on it. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting What do reviewers look for? This will vary from title to title, for example a journal with a strong research focus will put more emphasis on research methodology, while journals publishing case studies will focus on the quality of the case · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has accepted the invitation and/or at least one evaluation has After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". After some days, the status of the paper was changed from Submitted to Journal to AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. I didnt see the "under review However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. The editor usually asks reviewers whether they think that the submission should be published, and will expect an answer supported by a detailed review that includes suggestions for improving the submission. Related reading: “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. It's been "awaiting reviewer selection" for about a month now. Wait! It is not late yet. Search Sometimes, a reviewer may pull out after being assigned, for reasons of a lack of time, mismatch (with their subject area), or conflict of interest. Jika reviewer • The reviewer is based at the funding body of the paper • The author has recommended the reviewer • The reviewer has provided a personal (e. 18 Awaiting Admin Assignment 9. However, today, Awaiting reviewer selection Þ AE invites at least two reviewers. In such cases, the journal will assign a different reviewer. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. 21, awaiting AE decision. My manuscript was at the 'Waiting for Reviewers' Scores' status before moving to 'Awaiting CE Decision. See ‘Reviewer Verification’ in the Ethics and Best Practice The process of reviewer selection in S1M is quite straightforward. 3. ; Await, meanwhile, requires an object. 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step in the whole peer review process. " This status has not been changed for a month. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. 5 awaiting reviewer scores 3. 10 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10. The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: At least 4 reviewers have been selected, but less than 4 have been invited. 13 AE Recommendation 3. 1. One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now. ydaq sbkte ard wkjnqe irysld wrip vpk pcfyo eziwr gerg